Draft: 2D Skeleton

2D Skeleton.
2D Skeleton

Explanations for (1) to (3) are sourced from (Part 1 Dimensional Reanalysis). (1) To simplify, a vibrational state(X1) gains size then disperses into opposite directions. Since there are only two objects ,(X2 and X3), Local Shared State governs balance for all oriented and directional potentials. (2) The introduction of (X4) and (X5) creates dominant or harmonized directional potentials. (3) A repeated cycle in size and directional re-distribution occurs in an artificial sense because (X1) was an isolated object thus a real vibrational state.  

2D Skeleton.
2D Skeleton

(4)I rediscover Y as a function of X , but not for the same philosophical and dialectic reasons as Legacy Math. This was done through Attraction_Repulsion( Repulsion_Attraction) , their pseudo variants, and paths of least resistance from gas principles. To summarize, as (X2) and (X3) will generate disproportionate values against slower velocity values for (X7) and (X8).  Their imbalances in velocity values will create Pseudo-Repulsion_Attarction potentials realized as expanding or contracting median distances. Concurrently, (X7) and (X8) will attract to the center as conflicting potentials. This attracting potential will repel (X4) and (X5) into the Y dimension. (X4) and (X5) become functions of or transform into (Y1) and (Y2). During pressure from an attracting potential morphing into repulsion, (Y1) and (Y2) will produce (Y3) and (Y4). (Y1 to Y4) follow their paths of least resistance.  Y elements are experiencing higher quantities of Attraction_Repulsion(Repulsion_Attraction) and their pseudo forms.  The double Y dimensions helped me solve for clues as to how to establish the Accurate Model (see Part 6 Linear Versus Simultaneous Paths ).
The reason why this system manifests this way is due to its initial common directional potential as forward and backward. All copies will retain those potentials until they're reoriented by finding the least resistance or repulsion.

2D Skeleton.
2D Skeleton

If one includes the mirage of reference frames, the General Shared State can be expanding, or it can be an artificial vibrational state. Depending on what elements' frame is viewed, the model can change from this General Shared State's view into other shapes. I did a quick example at (5). I include its points of balance for where you would place a lever. Due to diluting effects of simultaneous paths and the nature of amplified paths from (Y1(X4)) and (Y2(X5))'s writing an inverse of their velocity values to (Y3) and (Y4), their perceivable slower sizes and quantities are closer towards a rightward path. As distance expands, these balances will continue to change shape into diamonds, trapeziums, and parallelograms. This ultimately means that the universe shape-shifts depending on what frame views it , at what period of time, and for what duration of time. How many would I require to form a basic loop? The Living Tribunal  didn't capture all of these effects... V_V Hu hmhmhmnnn ... What a pity it must be to face limits by Legacy frameworks.

Additional Details: Common Misconceptions, Higher Dimensional Construct, Compatibility: Area Mitosis , Compatibility Dimensions. 

The power of Darkness: Almighty Darkness

General Contents

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Isaac Newton Defeated

Image
  Isaac Newton's Gravitational Formula.  First thing to acknowledge is that Isaac Newton does not use a quantitative measure even though mass(quantity of matter) is label as a variable in his equations. His methods are proportional, and I'll link to some statements that I made clarifying differences between quantitative and proportional operations. Once you've understood these instructions, you can easily manipulate symbolic mathematical fabrications to conform to prior results through proportional manipulation. These methods alone don't completely  reproduce reality's outcomes or difficulties managing quantitative operations. Quantitative instructions have limitations and do not easily induce disordered confusion through subtracting, or ill-mannered addition of variables through proportional manipulation. I further that limitation by abandoning use for negative numbers, which removes information. 0.98 acceleration ,for the greater mass, flies into Dialect's fac...
Read more

Almighty Darkness

Image
Darker Daimon's Logic. Darkness is a concept of the mind. It is pure abstraction in mental frameworks . In constructs of Darkness,  Logic  is materialize by consistent and predictable  instructions . Inconsistencies and randomness possess no bodies in the darkest of realms because they're attributes for those whom seek blinding light.   With careful curtail sensibility to reason, all entities deriving from dark abstractions should convert to physical or external  reality. These  interpretations  can only be found here and another place. All other names have no association with me or my developments.  Darker Daimon's Logic. General Contents
Read more

Compatibility: 0.5 Plus 1 Dimension

Image
  Magnetic Cycles and Artificial Gravity Modulus Function First things come first, you'll have to understand prior dimensional instructions to understand what lead me here. You can catch up here if you hadn't:  Compatibility: 0.5 Dimension  . Artificial Gravity's inception and methods were introduced here:  Distance(Remaining Time)  .Alright, I'll try to make it shorter than prior posts, but you can't take my word for it at this injunction. The major difference here is with the notion of 2D. Second dimension, according to me, does not possess an inherent directional structure that emerges from entities settling or balancing into a 2d environment. What's unique to 2D is spin or rotation. Because 1D requires ranges of dense threshold levels across traveled distances, the entirety of 1D objects, and dependencies on density, it lacks the potential to reorient itself , as a unified whole, even though it can traverse directionally. More conflicting constituencies decr...
Read more