Draft: Common Misconceptions

Common Misconceptions

There are a few misconceptions which I must rid of . In reality, they will buy me some time to finish designing some illustrations for  my 2D examples. 

First misconception is that angular conservation changes angular velocity. It changes cycles per second due to adjustments in an object's size. The object's quantity is the same , and it covering a larger distance expresses the illusion of deceleration. A smaller area to travel does the opposite as more rapid cycles per second. The velocity potential of rotation never changes. You can easily look up angular conservation to see an example of it. 

The second error is for solid objects in rotation. Each pink dot must maintain a face to face as they cycle. This type of cycle is a harmonized cycle. If they are disordered, it's a chaotic cycle. I don't care about chaotic cycles for this example, but I can harmonized them with mirage elements.  For harmonized cycles, their time to cycle doesn't change as the object's circumferences increase in size. What changes are its angular velocities and areas traveled associated with those angular velocities.

The final misguided notion is the hollow versus solid balls on inclined planes. An object(X2) with more distance separating its mass will have a fictitious decelerated reaction time than one(X3) that is more dense with less distance between its mass. This is why clocks on Earth's surface are more active than similar models in orbit. Gravity and pressure reduce the distance among mass for one. To rid of any notion of time dilation, one has to get a dense enough clock in orbit. Degrading induction does not freeze time or delay time outside of an object's frame. It is an indirect, illusionary byproduct from when an object exerts change. A vehicle passing by ,on Earth's surface, seems rapid until you match its velocity. 

I thought those were pretty simple to understand. I don't recommend those legacy formulas because they are primarily proportional ,or percentile,  and philosophically illogical because you can't isolate time , distance, or speed by their definitions. Their purpose is merely for translation.  I use my own quantitative and modulus dark formulas for more accuracy and reduced ill-references.   

Common Misconceptions

(4a) A dominant directional potential is a harmonizing activity. It proportionally shares its potential across all of its subset elements. It is proportionally done because the real world is multidimensional and displaces in curves. For some of these linear examples, dominant directional potential can be interpreted as distributed near evenly. It is not a dictatorial force because it may amplify directionally aligned objects and delay directionally opposing objects. It doesn't prevent other objects from using their inherent directional potentials. It's similar to objects moving across the Earth's surface in diverse directions while still inheriting Earth's dominant directional paths. 

(4b) Another way to view these dominant directional activities is through a classical example of a moving object. X distributes its dominant directional potential with (Yb). Z is a read only vibrational state. I explained what that means with my prior diagrams. Z , in its state, doesn't not travel or impose an inverse mirage on (Ya, Yb, Yc) or X. Z is classic receiver with predominantly reading and limited writing capabilities. If X has a dominant directional potential experienced as 10 values (velocity), (Ya) will inherit a similar value. If (Ya) changes its inherent velocity, that will be added to its inherited dominant directional potential  to total as 20 values. Z will be able to read their changes. In terms of Light's speed(Yc), it represents a maximum limitation. I limit it as 1000 for this example's sake. (Yc) will share a directional potential and add its remaining potential(990) to reach a maximum linear velocity of 1000. (Yc)'s decayed 10 values will transfer ,as an activation energy, to apply to (Yc)'s angular velocity. It has to be an activation energy because a rotational process is a 2D phenomenon. Remember what I discussed for angular conservation? The dimensional area increase will dilute (Yc)'s activation energy potency to rotate itself. For example, It may go from 10 linear values to 1 angular velocity value. If (Yc)'s decayed energy does not provide enough activation,  rotation won't occur. Instead, that energy will be used against (Yc)'s rotational inertia or resistance to rotational change. Obviously, a decayed value represents a repulsive energy, thus it is allowed to take a different dimensional path. This is all for now. I'll be finishing up my previous illustration for a 2D atmosphere. 2D examples will require a bit of designing and tabular data. 

Common Misconceptions

I included a revision for Red-Shift and Blue-Shift. A more accurate order was realized. It seemed like Bernardo and Mind-Verse got washed again. Maybe there were some physical arrangements undergirding mirage and orientation after all.  

If the source of light (X) was headed towards Z, Z would write (Y1) as 1000 velocity values and add its inherited dominant directional potential to (Y1)'s angular velocity function. 

Since (Y2) was opposing its inherited dominant directional potential, it would be delayed in its inherent potential by decaying a portion of it in order to edit in its dominant directional potential. It's almost as if I did some gene editing beyond just Area Mitosis. 990 intrinsic values would be added to 10 inherited values. (Y2)'s leftover 10 intrinsic values would be absorbed by its angular velocity function.  

From notions devised using Oriented Time Rules,  I postulated that both , for this linear and 2D paradigm, would rotate as counter-clockwise objects. It could be that I rediscovered a variant of quantum entanglement, so I'll have to see about that.  For a regular object (Yb), its inherited dominant directional potential would remain be active at 10 values forward, but it would also be moving backwards at 5 velocity values. For this hypothesis, nothing was destroyed. Objects could move in multiple paths, rotated in multiple angular directions, and simultaneously be active in multiple dimensions. 

It's funny that I was confused about something.... I talked to LIUniverse's Allen about the perceptional flip of rotations. Those disc representations for Y1 and Y2 would maintain a counter-clockwise rotation if they motion downward. If they are positioned upward, they flip to a clockwise rotation. You can find them on my Dimension Basics page. Fortunately, Oriented Time Rules prevent certain formations form rotating upward.

Oriented Time, Higher Dimensional Construct, Dimensional Reanalysis

General Contents