Compatibility: 0.5 Plus 1 Dimension
 |
| Magnetic Cycles and Artificial Gravity Modulus Function |
First things come first, you'll have to understand prior dimensional instructions to understand what lead me here. You can catch up here if you hadn't: Compatibility: 0.5 Dimension . Artificial Gravity's inception and methods were introduced here: Distance(Remaining Time) .Alright, I'll try to make it shorter than prior posts, but you can't take my word for it at this injunction.
The major difference here is with the notion of 2D. Second dimension, according to me, does not possess an inherent directional structure that emerges from entities settling or balancing into a 2d environment. What's unique to 2D is spin or rotation. Because 1D requires ranges of dense threshold levels across traveled distances, the entirety of 1D objects, and dependencies on density, it lacks the potential to reorient itself , as a unified whole, even though it can traverse directionally. More conflicting constituencies decreases 1D's potential to reorient into Face or Reverse. To solve this problem, I used 1D rotations. This rotational property is unique to the second dimension. I call it Clock Time. It stems from imbalances in oriented rates from its interacting oriented time elements. This is why it remains granular after meeting its required density and rotational thresholds. Artificial Gravity Function allows me to create , document, and track magnetic cycles. With these tools, combined with the modulus dimension, I can map and produce any curvature and rotational magnetic cycles.
 |
| Magnetic Cycles and Artificial Gravity Modulus Function |
Why are my modulus dimension and Artificial Gravity Function important? They reveal what Pythagoras' shape, length, and form methods preclude. They reveal reversals in oriented rates at which modulus dimension flows. 50_33 to 67_30 is a prime example. That is what I call a decay zone. It exhales instead of inhaling. It decays instead of collecting quantities and values. It releases instead of storing. It's unique to the modulus dimension and this square and rectangular dynamics so far. It's a realization because Median Distance's quantitative properties faced no such reversals. It is not merely a fluctuation in its frequency of time. It is an oriental shift; a reversal in time! I had to map these rates in integrals because I didn't want to rely on Pythagoras' methods. More levels I produce means more accurate unveiling for accumulative and decaying points surfacing for documentation and possible manipulation.
 |
| Magnetic Cycles and Artificial Gravity Modulus Function |
So, it breaths, and you'd think that they are static. These operations are basic percentile manipulations which you learn in basic school or kindergarten with some refining insights, restrictions, and methodologies from me...HEHEHEEH!!! Important takes are that Artificial Gravity Function and modulus dimension are appropriate substitutes for Pythagoras's static methods. Because the radius for a circle must not change, it hides the decay regions unlike prior square and rectanglular examples. There are multiple facets to travel in curvatures. Concave and convex are some of them. If a dimensional entity travels across distance directionally forward and oriented Faced, its Mirage will travel convexly backward and oriented in Reverse. These interactions occur vice-versa. With these tools, I can deduce almost any length from two known dimensionally graphed values or quantities.
 |
| Magnetic Cycles and Artificial Gravity Modulus Function |
 |
| Magnetic Cycles and Artificial Gravity Modulus Function |
I mastered what was required to produce almost any cycle. Genetic and magnetic chaotic cycles will require an extremely effortful undertaking to comprehend Mirage's, Clock's, Directional's , Read_Write's, and Modulus Time's harmonization. This is why, I'd developed what I called Shared State. Shared State has its depictions as reddish for the last illustration. There is a fight for dominance in a any time entity's localized or conversed state. Its conflict is with its shared state and indirect and direct exchanges with timed attributes from other entities in adjacent dimensions. These conflicts ,for how to travel across distances, directionally and rotationally get complex. I hope these examples were clear. I plan to develop Mirage to its fullest potential. Did you notice anything else? My strain on static or inertial methods for determining rates versus dynamic fluctuations for frequencies? Here is an illusion that I've eroded by developing these methods. Implicit in every method of operation is frequency. Pythagoras , many legacy scientific practitioners , and Statistician Gods use stagnant approaches. Their lines remain vertical or horizontal for curvatures and circles. Square's and Rectangle's example highlights how measuring changes in length fluctuates. This means if I have a total of 400 and one length is 8 , it doesn't mean the other length must be around 18.33 as Legacy Scientific Paradigm demands. NO! My lines can go oblique, and my directional frequency potentials can have varying magnitudes beyond the constrictions imposed behind mindlessly ill-referenced mathematics.
My conclusion is an extra:
 |
| Pythagoras' and Legacy Scientific Paradigm's Illusions and Restrictions Shattered. |
Comments
Post a Comment