Draft: Compatibility Dimensions

 

Perfecting Dimensional Balance.
Perfecting Dimensional Balance

I start with some dimensional framework. They are 0.5 to 1 dimensions. You can read more about these here: Compatibility: 0.5 Plus 1 Dimension and here Distance(Remaining Time).These balancing acts are compelling beyond storing values and merging quantities into types of vibration. Here, amplification and degradation are appropriately assign to their Shared State. I don't do stagnation here, so solutions denied aren't logically convincing if one entity has no progression in time. This significantly reduces their Shared State's solutions.  

1 Dimensional Magnetic State and Induction.
1 Dimensional Magnetic State and Induction

I advance with two 0.5 dimensional entities(A and B). They are join by their median distance due to differences between their frequencies in time and their directional time's magnitudes. Their base directional time values are combine by using my Shared State formula. Those reddish circumferences represent their combined Clock Time and Directional Time with changes in their properties. Artificial Gravity Functions illustrate their one dimensional circumferences. These circumferences are one dimensional lengths that I label as X or W for width. Their Shared State represents a 1 dimensional cycle; A cycle without a true sense of Y for horizontal or Z for vertical. Disparities between their frequencies in directional and clock time allow for another type of balancing act. If either Clock Time or Directional Time elapse in time, they both will face degradation in their Shared States. If one is greater than the other, the lesser will face greater degradation which will result in lesser degradation frequency in the other. I choose to interpret this as induction. These new findings allow me to correct a misunderstanding about induction here: Time Elements' Usefulness. There, induction accelerates in Clock Time if Directional Time increases while Clock Time reduces Directional Time and vice-versa. That balancing act is inaccurate. They both decrease each other. It's a matter of which is greater that passes on a greater degradation. What remain is rotational functionality. Outer circumferences are always faster , in an harmonized tune state, for all objects regardless of changes in their sizes. Curved Median Distance(bluish) results from conflicts between Clock Time and Directional Time in a Shared State. As objects advance in Clock Time, their Directional Time will develop high resistance. It is high resistance from deformation when in collisions with Directional Time's potentials. It would require a significant distribution of directional time to amplify its Directional Time's progression. High resistance ,due to Directional Time's reduction, indicates a transfer from Directional Time to Curved Median Distance( can mean high induction) under lesser depreciating Clock Time. You should remember that at no time did A and B stop elapsing forward in time at 2 and 4 values. That is their conserved base state which should be in reference at all times. It's logical even if their Shared State balances their directional values at 1 each for a total of 2 realized Median Distance as time progresses. 

Transition from Second to Third Dimension.
Transition from Second to Third Dimension.

Curved Median Distance is not as accurate as I could make it, but it is appropriate for one dimensional cycles. I convert Clock Time to a linear form by calculating their arc lengths by incorporating Directional Time's percentile, forward, potential values. 2D magnetic cycles will require a radius to include additional sizes until it meets thresholds for rotation, density, size, quantity, value, and quality. You notice how exchanges occur between additional Directional Time? This feature will make my curved median area or distances more accurate. Finally, I will collide objects with Clock Time values that meet a density threshold. Depending on the transformational properties of a collision, I might get a 3D object with multiple rotations. Two or more 3D objects will be called orbitals or orbits. You can understand my foundations for this here: Oriented Time .

Extra: I want to develop oblique lines instead of horizontal and vertical lines for capturing cycles( I've given up this approach for now because it seems impossible). 2D will be complete then. For now, these are ideas that I'm developing resourceful examples for
potential explanation and solution for Faraday's Paradox. This means there were no contradictions as I'd expected. Be wary of "measurements" and other contradictory nonsense Legacy Scientific Paradigm will impose on you about magnetic operations. Scientific Experimental Bugs .
1 Dimensional Magnetic State and Induction.
1 Dimensional Magnetic State and Induction
No Faraday's Paradox in Induction 
General Contents

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Isaac Newton Defeated

Image
  Isaac Newton's Gravitational Formula.  First thing to acknowledge is that Isaac Newton does not use a quantitative measure even though mass(quantity of matter) is label as a variable in his equations. His methods are proportional, and I'll link to some statements that I made clarifying differences between quantitative and proportional operations. Once you've understood these instructions, you can easily manipulate symbolic mathematical fabrications to conform to prior results through proportional manipulation. These methods alone don't completely  reproduce reality's outcomes or difficulties managing quantitative operations. Quantitative instructions have limitations and do not easily induce disordered confusion through subtracting, or ill-mannered addition of variables through proportional manipulation. I further that limitation by abandoning use for negative numbers, which removes information. 0.98 acceleration ,for the greater mass, flies into Dialect's fac...
Read more

Almighty Darkness

Image
Darker Daimon's Logic. Darkness is a concept of the mind. It is pure abstraction in mental frameworks . In constructs of Darkness,  Logic  is materialize by consistent and predictable  instructions . Inconsistencies and randomness possess no bodies in the darkest of realms because they're attributes for those whom seek blinding light.   With careful curtail sensibility to reason, all entities deriving from dark abstractions should convert to physical or external  reality. These  interpretations  can only be found here and another place. All other names have no association with me or my developments.  Darker Daimon's Logic. General Contents
Read more

Compatibility: 0.5 Plus 1 Dimension

Image
  Magnetic Cycles and Artificial Gravity Modulus Function First things come first, you'll have to understand prior dimensional instructions to understand what lead me here. You can catch up here if you hadn't:  Compatibility: 0.5 Dimension  . Artificial Gravity's inception and methods were introduced here:  Distance(Remaining Time)  .Alright, I'll try to make it shorter than prior posts, but you can't take my word for it at this injunction. The major difference here is with the notion of 2D. Second dimension, according to me, does not possess an inherent directional structure that emerges from entities settling or balancing into a 2d environment. What's unique to 2D is spin or rotation. Because 1D requires ranges of dense threshold levels across traveled distances, the entirety of 1D objects, and dependencies on density, it lacks the potential to reorient itself , as a unified whole, even though it can traverse directionally. More conflicting constituencies decr...
Read more