 |
| Linear Versus Simultaneous Paths |
I had previous knowledge of simultaneous paths as right or left directions because I was under a 2D impression That upward plus a forward would lead to leftward kinesics. I realized that I required a left and right for 3D planes, so I relabeled 2D left and right as pseudo-left and right. Now, I'll scrap those entirely. Simultaneous paths made me realize that they're dimensions of their own. Simultaneous paths were building blocks for two dimensional and higher architectures. I could synchronize linear and coextensive paths. (1b) illustrated a few examples of what simultaneous paths should represent( Conflicting, Neutral, and Amplifying). They were allocations of 1 dimensional paths.
 |
| Linear Versus Simultaneous Paths |
The principle of reduced magnitude over larger surface areas should be enforced. Legacy calculations used area formulas to calculate matching lengths. If linear transition to 2D frames had to be diluted in magnitude, those legacy instruction won't reflect what they intended. On top of that argument, proportional length multiplying won't properly reflect 2D constructs and coordinates. For every strip of a 4 upward, there must be 4 forward in a concurrent 2D path. LOL! ... Hmnnn... Madness!! You can examine (2a to b) for a clear depiction. Legacy Pythagorean Models were accurate for estimating one dimensional lengths. They were what my modulus function was based on in percentile estimates and where proportions are appropriate. Modulus Function was not limited to mirroring Pythagorean Theorem because I could map anything for indirect observations. Legacy methods don't readily capture quantitative elements for higher dimensional models. My Dark Formula was incomplete because of a more accurate consideration. It is unknown how many linear forwards could be placed in a linear upward of 4 and vice-versa. Why couldn't I pick an arbitrary number of forwards in an upward? It's because the dimension would become imbalance and contradictory. Maybe it's possible to only travel into10 forwards ,instead of 1 million, in order to reach 4 upwards. I rather the idea that when settled in a 2D framework, one must always possess a unit of length for every width which was what my incomplete formula illustrated.
 |
| Linear Versus Simultaneous Paths |
(3a) explained the subtle contrast between internal and external navigations. For internal, directions remained what they were regardless of how an object maneuvered , while external navigation relied on fixed directional frameworks. To understand internal , one could rotate and examine if its right hand ever stopped being its right hand. It won't. This was also how common directions worked. Once you originated from a single or series of directions, that original object ,and its copies, would always possess those initial directions. It could only adjust in magnitude as more copies were made , reference frames and mirages adjusted their inherent and inherited properties, or fuel additional potentials.
(3b) is a diagram showing out forward and backward potentials weren't destroyed using moving-conveyor mechanisms. Instead, they receded into an artificial vibrational state of 10 values. An artificial vibrational state was 'near equivalent (=<>=)' to an inertial vibrational state. Only difference was an artificial V-State traveled while an inertial V-State supported non-travel. An artificial vibration was a polarizing neutral state. An inertial vibration was a mono-state with polarizing oriented potentials. I thought of these fusions as incomplete mergers and separations. A simultaneous path represented a larger area than a one dimensional, linear path. Therefore, 2 units of conflicting linear potentials transformed into 2 artificial vibrational units which in turn represented 1 potential to concurrently travel forward and backward.
It's important to note that I'm unsure about the full consequence for a conflicting simultaneous path. Either it stored pressure to transition into an inertial V-State in order to reverse from a higher to a lower dimension, or it simply stored those potentials to artificially travel in parallel with its dominant remaining potential. It could be for both incase of the absence of another.
General Contents
Comments
Post a Comment