Note: I don't support IQ. These examples are meant to showcase its absurdity and ineffectiveness. Since I assert that negative values possess nonexistent size, -40 reflects the insignificance of the IQ concept. This page is now obsolete. Some logics ,here, remain useful and can be recycled to develop promising approaches for determining areas for 2D environments. You can explore other attempts here Compatibility: 2D Area .
 |
| Calculating Areas Versus Lengths |
Expert Statistician God, KA-REEEEEEEEM!!!!, refuses to handle lead being in pipes for Legacy Scientific Paradigm and their ill-referenced mathematics. When you're dealing with values and quantities ,contrasting with their percentages, an object's area is always equal to , for one dimensional objects, or greater than its perimeters and circumferences. All shapes consist of multiple one dimensional lengths for X or Y in my case. It makes no sense that an area has less numerical quantities and values than its lesser parts. It makes sense that a circumference or perimeter has more directional potential... :O OMG! Look at this nonsense concept that I've created! It's not solely a matter of quantity in traveled distance. It's a matter of density and directional bias. While linear lengths might have one or two directional potentials, an area can have multiple conflicting potentials which result in less directional bias in comparison.
 |
| Calculating Areas Versus Lengths |
I have multiple Xes and Ys stack together to balance each other's total quantities and values. For every X, there must be a Y in 2D. Remember, their directional potentials, frequencies, and densities might be imbalance, but their quantities and values are similar. This is why, I created this blog. If some lucky soul encounters it, he or she will unlock rewards. Like I've said in prior posts, no one fully understands quantities and values even among so called experts. Pythagoras is ultimately incorrect. Each of those linear lines represents a frequency. The worst part is, there are oblique and circular lines embedded within X * Y (2D) that possess different frequencies in directional potential when compared with X and Y. I tried to escape these linear line traps to become closer to a Curved Brain , but it seems impossible at my current state, so I drew with Pythagoras. The war continues with you Kareem Carr and Legacy Scientific Paradigm.
Conclusion, My formula was not perfectly accurate (more than Kareem's, Legacy Scientific Paradigm's, and Pythagoras) because there is no (300% * 200% = 600%) in 2D for example. That's misuse of the modulus dimension; it is ill-referenced. I used the modulus only to document or map changes and extract from existing values or quantities to transfer, convert, or exchange. I do not destroy anything. My modulus dimension represent percentages. It is not a remainder. In 2D, there are 3(y) quantities of 2(x) plus 2(x) quantities of 3(y). They are similar total values and quantities with imbalance directional potentials with differing frequencies. You can't purposefully miscalculate linear qualities as substitute for higher dimensional qualities. I've said ,in Dimension Basics Part 2: Incomplete Merger and Separation , that higher dimensional entities can't perceive higher or smaller dimensions. With no y in Xes or x in Ys for one dimension, X can never fill Y's positions even if I stack them because (nothing + nothing) is still "non-existent" in Y's case. My way is to rotate in Clock Time. I made these drafts to outline and review dark concepts and formulas before I make their full pages with pristine examples.
Extras: The present and future are mine with this collection to my dark formulas. If you pay attention, copies for X and Y behave like their originals' Mirage states. It's a fruitful exchange. My ideas remain logical and reasonable. You can say that I'm beginning to solve the genetic and chaotic magnetic cycles. My structure deny illogical and contradictory negative numbers an existence. I couldn't ask for anything better.
 |
Greater Area Dark Formula
|
MAJOR EDIT!: We are all inaccurate. Some more than others. How frustrating the severity and lack of control over basic things like numbers, values, qualities, and quantities I possess. When I find a solution, I'll draft a new page to complete this war. The problem is Y has no X, and X has no Y. When I gave them Mirage through horizontal and vertical positions, they still lack an inherent trait that allows some quantities and values from either sides. Even if I share a portion of X with Y and vice-versa, those portions will require additional portions from themselves. It's endless, and it seems these methods can't fully capture the two dimensional environment much less higher ones.
Comments
Post a Comment