Incomplete Merger and Separation.

 

Incompleteness Dimensions

After reviewing Pythagoras methods, I've stumbled on a piece of logic that might be useful to incorporate into my current catalog. I disagree with his mathematical conclusions, but obscure logic is there that I will make mine. The idea that settled dimensions are near incapable of degradation or upgrades once they achieve a certain balance. This means, I want to separate dimensions into a few kinds. Balance, imbalance, and semi-balance are currently in place. They're similar to my magnetic states as pure, half, and contaminated. I'll admit that this is a rough draft, but the logic enhances my prior ones; the concept of incomplete merger and separation. Nothing has totally merge as in 4 = 2+2. Nothing is completely separate as in the plus operator connecting 2+2. If 4 was a pure merger , I would be unable to separate it. I plan to maintain these principles. Yet, once something achieves a certain balance, it becomes difficult, I really mean near impossible or uncertain, to degrade, upgrade, or transform that balance into another level of dimension. This is synonymous with values in my quantity, value, and quality section. This "difficulty" is what example (A) represents. Each dimension is unique. They have their own spaces or distances, and they can have shared properties. (B) reflects my mechanisms behind these logical formulas. When dimensional elements of the same type adds together, their type of dimensional size increases. For example, 3D + 3D will increase their shared size and possibly their shared time properties. This is similar for 2D+2D , or 1D + 1D. On the other hand, 3D + 2D, or 3D + 2D + 1D doesn't increase the unique size for 3D, 2D, or 1D. Their shared properties might be affected, but their incompleteness and uniqueness maintain their own balances. The implication behind these notions is a dimension can attach or house unlimited amounts of a prior or higher dimensions including similar dimensional types. This aligns with some dimensional basics and ameliorates my storage and retrieval concepts. For example, a unique 2D element can never influence the balance size of a 3D element because it would require depth that it doesn't possess. This is similar vice-versa. A 3D element can't give a unique 2D element it's depth because that would imbalance the 2D element's uniqueness. This is the heart of incomplete merger and separation. A more logical and consistent form of Gödel's Incompleteness plus Pythagoras' dimensional  implications when mixed with my topological thought experiments and dark logics. A great analogy is a topological blackbody concept. A 3D blackbody absorbs 3D,2D, and 1D elements to release them once it achieves an activity threshold. Therefore, entities that settle in the 3D world cannot perceive 2D and 1D elements and vice-versa due to incompleteness or lack of balancing properties(height, width, or depth). What they perceive is reflected activity from an affected 3D entity or similar type of dimensional element. (B) illustrates many variations, and (A)'s 1D suggests there can be different dimensional orientations apart from directional time. In essence, I'm stealing Gödel's catchy phrase and an insight even Pythagoras couldn't see to my knowledge. It really has little else to do with them. I plan to further test these implications. 

Key pages to get familiar: Everything from Dimension Basics to Distance(Remaining Time) in my general contents section. Plus, R.I.P Pythagoras . Other posts are very important, too.

General Contents