What are Quantity, Value, and Quality?


What are quantity, value, and quality.
Does 1*1=2 ?

I'm on the position that no-one has a complete outline for axioms quantity, value, and quality. Every example that I've seen operates on partial and inconsistent bases. For further elaboration on my stance, this blog's error sections "ill-reference and division problems" should clarify. I'll start with an example. (A) is the classical way for multiplying integers. These instructions occupy multiple spheres like quantity and proportion(percentage),so I say that they represent multiple mental frameworks. One can interchange between them to arrive at a final outcome which also operates within those spheres. This is why 100% of nothing is nothing (1 * 0  = 0). Multiplication is a variant of addition because it operates in the sphere of quantity. Therefore, 4+4 is equivalent to 2 * 4 = 8. This equivalence will create certain problems for consistency down the line. (B) operates mainly in the quantitative sphere from my understanding of  its instructions. It presumes a more concrete form of operation with real underlining references. Therefore, 1 * nothing is still left with something ( 1 * 0 = 1). Since 1*4 is 5 , me applying that action twice reflect twice as much reactions. While these behaviors are interesting , they are not the highest levels of mathematical abstraction , consistent referencing, and instructions.   

Darker Daimon's Quantity, Value, and Quality Examples.
Darker Daimon's Quantity, Value, and Quality Examples. 

In this blog's division problem section, it explains slight abnormalities within the structure or layout for quantities. Here, division ,at its root, assumes an average result stemming from splitting or comparing relationships between its numerator and denominator. For example, dividing 4/2 results in an average of 2. An average might not always represent distinctive properties. The value and quantity resulting from an operation, I call their abnormal varieties Quality.  It matters to me whether I have 4 quantities of 2 sized candies , or 2 quantities of 4 sized candies. I represent Quantity as Q and Value as V. Remember, these symbols are just drawings. They are some axioms or abstract concepts that I am mapping using memory as proxy for real world objects that are essential for maintaining consistency within logic. Take for example (D), it is a classical concept for finance. I have 2 quantities of coins worth 2 cents each. Traditionally, they're equivalent to 4 cents. In values and total proportionalities? Sure they are. But in quality and quantity, they are not, since two quantities of items are not equivalent to one quantity of another item. I further split an original coin, worth  2 cents, into 2 quantities worth 1 cent each. I change the quality of that coin, I would suggest, so it isn't entirely equivalent in all spheres. Additional spheres, value and quality, were developed while trying to remove inconsistencies from traditional mathematics in order to replace them with sound and logical directives. Without this reorganization, quantities would represent inconsistent and nebulous ideas. Since all these axioms used the same number system, individually, they were all inconsistent. Only by using and interchanging them can one get their illusion of logic and consistency. The real world is the only standard that indicates we ought to categorize things distinctively that behave slightly different under changing conditions. 

Other epistemological fields like chemistry, biology, material science, and physical engineering already deal with concepts like quantity, quality, value, and proportion, but their instructions and method of calculations are that of primitive, legacy mathematicians. Chemistry and biology, in particular, understand to certain degrees my concept of  "not entirely merge or separate". Options trading and contracts also embed quantities within quantities like example (B).  You can read my error section for more details. That said, I don't completely understand how to consistently factor in these conceptual phenomena , so it is an aim of mine to further develop my metacognition concerning these subjects and their applications to concrete reality. Edit( I already found a way before the Pentagon did by time I developed Compatibility: Area Mitosis >:P).  If there is an entity that can beat me at this race, it is the United States' Pentagon or its executive apparatus more broadly. They have old training films using three spherical concepts of value, quantity, and proportionality. I've never seen them apply it to the degree that I've come to understand. Yet, if an organization of people are concealing a new set of secret knowledge or instruction, I would bet on them.

General Contents

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Isaac Newton Defeated

Image
  Isaac Newton's Gravitational Formula.  First thing to acknowledge is that Isaac Newton does not use a quantitative measure even though mass(quantity of matter) is label as a variable in his equations. His methods are proportional, and I'll link to some statements that I made clarifying differences between quantitative and proportional operations. Once you've understood these instructions, you can easily manipulate symbolic mathematical fabrications to conform to prior results through proportional manipulation. These methods alone don't completely  reproduce reality's outcomes or difficulties managing quantitative operations. Quantitative instructions have limitations and do not easily induce disordered confusion through subtracting, or ill-mannered addition of variables through proportional manipulation. I further that limitation by abandoning use for negative numbers, which removes information. 0.98 acceleration ,for the greater mass, flies into Dialect's fac...
Read more

Almighty Darkness

Image
Darker Daimon's Logic. Darkness is a concept of the mind. It is pure abstraction in mental frameworks . In constructs of Darkness,  Logic  is materialize by consistent and predictable  instructions . Inconsistencies and randomness possess no bodies in the darkest of realms because they're attributes for those whom seek blinding light.   With careful curtail sensibility to reason, all entities deriving from dark abstractions should convert to physical or external  reality. These  interpretations  can only be found here and another place. All other names have no association with me or my developments.  Darker Daimon's Logic. General Contents
Read more

Compatibility: 0.5 Plus 1 Dimension

Image
  Magnetic Cycles and Artificial Gravity Modulus Function First things come first, you'll have to understand prior dimensional instructions to understand what lead me here. You can catch up here if you hadn't:  Compatibility: 0.5 Dimension  . Artificial Gravity's inception and methods were introduced here:  Distance(Remaining Time)  .Alright, I'll try to make it shorter than prior posts, but you can't take my word for it at this injunction. The major difference here is with the notion of 2D. Second dimension, according to me, does not possess an inherent directional structure that emerges from entities settling or balancing into a 2d environment. What's unique to 2D is spin or rotation. Because 1D requires ranges of dense threshold levels across traveled distances, the entirety of 1D objects, and dependencies on density, it lacks the potential to reorient itself , as a unified whole, even though it can traverse directionally. More conflicting constituencies decr...
Read more