Nonsensical Probability Interpretations

Nonsensical Probability Interpretations.

This section was dedicated to ridiculing the shallow and incomplete description of the universe proposed by advocates for the uncertainty and probability hypotheses.

(1) was very simple. There was one coin that flipped on its head or its tail. According to probability theory, the "chance" for landing head versus tail was 50/50%.

(2) The black rectangle represents some sequence for coin flipped and the total amount of time it took for all flips to occur.

(3) had two additional formulas. (3b) used stored interpretations , or memory, from past flips to determine the chance for repeated flips as heads or tails. (3a), I used the idea of storing data from past flips to help determine the rate of occurrences of each new flip. As older flips increased, new value for determining if an event actually took place decreased. (3a) was the first method used to identify the absurdity underpinning probability's conjectures.

(4) Probability required observers to collect data in a timely manner. Each observer used previous formulas, but they had relatively separate windows of time to determine their results. As a "key" result, some collected less data than others. Observer 1 collected data for the entire time period. Observer 2 collected data for a day. Observer 3 tested its result after an hour. Observer 3 determined that 1 head occurred at 100% with 0% chance for it not being a real head flip , and it then refreshed its memory. Another hour, it determined tails occurred at 100% with 0% chance tails wasn't a real event. Observer 3's chances for each result remained at 50/50% standard interpretation. Observer 2 saw the actuality for heads or tails dropped to 10% and 16.7%. So, 90% chance a head flip wasn't going to be real versus 83.3% chance a tail flip wasn't going to be real. Its determined rate for heads was 31.25% and tails 18.75% against the standard 50/50%. Observer 1 collected all data for the allotted time. It determined chances for heads and tails to be real occurrences are H1.05% and T0.95%. It determined the rate for heads to actualize was 47.5% and tails 52.5% against the standard 50/50%. 'What was the point for (4)? The point was that the universe is a vast paradigm of space-time. The Human's window for random tests are irrelevant relative to the scale of the universe, and chances for their probabilistic interpretations being an actuality reduce as the Totally Random Universe's past allocates time and its space amplifies calculative entropy. Entropy means the amount of patterned distinctions energy can take in the voids of empty space. These distinctions are suppressed by their current calculations just for Earth within a very narrow timespan. It's made negligible even for predictable arrangements of matter commanded by Earth. The only way out for randomness is for humans to limit it within an hour which removes the significance of probability by reducing its biased selection through its dependence on past or future time, and distribution of ill-referenced mathematical instructions. A subset of future time is what they can predict before its occurrence. Observer 3 is my impression, so it makes sense against these absurdities. (5a) was a reminder that throughout this test's scope in time there was only 1 coin. Certainly, someone or group desired the illusion for only heads or tails to be judged as occurring and never simultaneously, but there was always a tail if head flipped but made hidden by certain interpretations. At no point did the coin lose or erase its tail. In the real world, head and tail happened at 100%. It was you who purposefully chose to erase data in order to suit and shape a certain ideology. (5b) reintroduced section(2). That time, the segmented observer was not the one making the rules. It was the Totally Random Universe like advocates wanted it to be. Totally Random Universe presented to High IQ Sir Clown Cox of the Neanderthal Gene some consecutive segments of events and forwarded them in time. Instead of an orderly arrow of time, Totally Random Universe jumped all around its windows of time from one end to the next. For sequence 4, it reversed its direction in dimensionless reality to present some past data with familiar crossovers. Totally Random Universe was kind of outside the limits of localized objects, so it was allowed to be omnipresent possessing the ability to select from any window of time(past, present, or future). According to Observer High IQ Sir Clown Cox , all he saw was a consecutive sequence of coin flips, and he had all the necessary details to determine that the vast scale of the universe was totally random. He exclaimed , like his father Dirac, "there was no better approach than probability and Heisenberg's Indeterminacy Principle!" (5b) followed section(4)'s conclusion. Observer High IQ Sir Clown Cox's time ,as an allotment of data, was extremely inconsequential to have determined anything according to his probability theory. The chance for him to be correct about anything was near 0% and sometimes negative due to his uncertainty for the direction of time. While for logical observers like me, probability wasn't even a legitimate rationalization for the Complete Universe, so we remained using interpretations like Observer 3's. (6) used the Big Bang Theory as reason to discard both the Big Bang Theory and its uncertainty notions. After all, this was where probability began. Big Bang Ah! BOOM BOOOM! Chapter 1 verse Uncertainty: 'In the beginning, an object in size was all there was. It was omniscient(all data there was), omnipotent (all united forces), and omnipresent (all places there was). It need not travel, since it was already everywhere. It had all forces and no external force could will it or hindered it, so it willed itself with all unlimited powers. There was nothing else aside from what it was , so all knowledge and information harbored within its size. It was dense, yet had no other object to determine that density. It was extremely hot, yet had no other object to determine its speed or average temperature. It was alone, yet nothing else to absorb its absolute zero.' I thought," Damn, Nephilim Christ even saw the absurdity of bearing witness to himself, though he tried to get away with it." Anyway, such an entity had to have a flat wavelength and a vertical amplitude. Totally Random Universe's flat wavelength and vertical amplitude were mirror images of the other, yet they represented some disproportionately conflicting concepts. Flat wavelength meant energy dissipated at an unimaginable rate and became an environment of sheer coldness, while maximum amplitude suggested it had endless energy as Planck Temperature. Thus, Totally Random Universe was a polarized 1 coin with a head and a tail before the "emergence" of space-time. Emergence was another corroding injection from Darwin's evolution hypothesis. In probability theory, the chance for something being at a location is proportional to its amplitude. Therefore, the Big Bang represented Observer(3)'s near inertial frame and certainty of events. In such a frame, there was no room for probability. It was either 100% cold or 100% hot like a certain hypothesis that cared only about which side the coin flipped on and not both. If everything was at maximum(hot and expanded), where exactly could space-time be expanding towards? If everything was at minimum(cold and miniature) , how could everything be at and expanded from a non-traveling size? Totally Random Universe was already at maximum wavelength at the Big Bang, so where was space-time and energy dispensation expanding toward? Where was room for anything other than 100% existence with that type of vertical amplitude? High IQ Sir Clown Cox of The Neanderthal Gene, the uncertainty principle was for senile men , and randomness was likely a psyop program used to determine who was insubordinate and how well some forces in society had a grip on its ideologies ,development of thought, and harmfully malicious regulation over others' actions. In conclusion, the only thing these concepts marginally captured was the cyclic nature for transferring heat from hot to cold and vice-versa. Plus, we know cold cannot be moved, so that leaves 1 option. It leaves the reality we are in because I exclude the logic of the Big Bang Ah Boom BOOOM! Ill-References ,War With Statistician God ,Scientific Experimental Bugs

opposition's response: https://youtube.com/shorts/mzVEJJDYqWo?si=iz8cpoCX_SLVKcvT


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Isaac Newton Defeated

Almighty Darkness

Compatibility: 0.5 Plus 1 Dimension