Compatibility: Real 2D Area
Variables become artificial variants when they are no longer subjected to 0.5 dimension. All variables marked with the gray mirage symbol operates indirectly via the modulus or percentile(%) function.. All dimensions use prior dimensions indirectly and directly. Once a dimension rearranges into a different form, say from 1D to 2D, it no longer maintains exact qualities due to mismatching in symmetry required to maintain dimensional balance. A symmetry is matching piece for a puzzle in Nature. Other dimensions are used in 'dimensional rebalancing' processes. Therefore Pythagorean Theorem's irreducibility and prohibition on backward capabilities are partially removed. To clarify, a 2D plane cannot reduce itself into a prior dimension form in isolation. It requires a highly impactful 'dominant directional potential' to induce reversibility by exchangeable and replenished effects. An entity achieves other forms of dimension by initiating a rebalancing process. It's the only logical way from basic principle that I was able to recognize after studying my 2D cyclic structure. All examples will clear up this section.
1a) Vibration is the first state. It's simply a minimal state of change. Vibration can become any value through reorientation. It simply takes on a different reference frame of itself. Read_Write , and vice-versa, are a set of oriented functions in 0.5 dimension. Each variable stores values and inverses as R_W and W_R. Value is a superclass for all other variables. They all use it as their common exchange currency.
1b) Quantity is a reorientation of vibration. It has no size, but it counts them. A count isn't a physical or direct length. It's an indirect representation that iterations like time. Some variables like size will be direct , and others falling under distance ,quantity, and time will be indirect.
1c) Vibrational state is a monopole which is equivalent to a neutral polarity. Artificial vibration isn't original because it doesn't occur in an isolated inertial frame like dimension 0.5. It is in 1D where traveled distance is introduced. A size isn't a traveled distance as a result. Each orientation is not necessarily the similar except for their underlining currencies in value and vibration. Directional potential is the limited potential to travel in a certain direction. slope velocity is derived from the rebalancing of directional potential amplified by vibration.
Arc is a 2D directional potential as a portion of an hypotenuse. Rotational energy is the arc amplified by the natural frequency of a harmonized tuned ,or chaotic noise, subset of circumferences.
2a) section outlines all formulas that will be used to derive outcomes for some thought experiments. Thought experiments will range from minimal existence as change, time, motion, collisions, shared state effects, deciphering the encryption of dark abstract computational language plus Nature's positional code by referring heir binary to multi-dimensional logics to common symbols, etc. I'll attempt to solve and answer some quarries like what is the process of rebalancing?, how sized objects generate the effects of weight via the lever principle?, what is directional potential ohms_amplification ?, how to solve the wheel paradox?, what causes decay?, what produces radioactivity?, how reflection and refraction are directional matrix, or symmetrical, rebalancing?, what are the natures of curved dimensions and simultaneous paths? , what are internal , external, and combined directions? and more.
Positional language represents a system's inability to meet Nature's required threshold to activate a variable of change. In this case, 'median distance' requires greater plus special arrangement of events and things in order for median distance to signal its emergence. The other is the lapse between the recording of precise change by Nature and the abstract labeling of the position. One is the logic of nature, and the other is the logic of numerals. Together, a code emerges that inscribe fluctuating signals for positional change and median distance. I could have used any symbol. It's not the numeral symbols that matter, but the logic I properly reference to them. They represent fundamental minimum to maximum changes in energy or activity by distance and position. To clarify, Nature inherently communicates using logic to the abstract mind capable of recognizing and reproducing dynamic changes.
2b) Change as conduit for motion from 0.5 to 2D.
Vibration exists as Nature's minimum balance. I'll call it the first maximum function. It exists between min() and max() realities. In other words, it's a set that contains attributes that are not yet materialized as apart of that set. I could have said zero(0) dormant sets, but it won't meet the logical definition. Not a set, or not zero, represents 'the inability to reach a threshold of change in order to activate a function or variable'. Therefore, 'not zero' is nothing like zero in the traditional philosophical sense. Not zero is a type of resistance to overcome in order to perpetuate change. This redefinition will be very important in order to understand that Nephilim Darker Du Daimon's calculative logic is THE REAL LANGUAGE OF THE UNIVERSE!
Inertial Momentum and Artificial Momentum:
Inertial Momentum is an object's 'quantitative size' amplified by its slope velocity ,which translates to oriented vibration in 0.5 dimension, plus its quantitative size amplified by 'inertial frequency'.
Iteration of time:
The passage of 'inertial oriented time' occurs due to the consumption and replenishment of 'directional potential'. Directional potential is ideality extracted when a body produces a 'neutrally polarized potential state' or an 'artificial monopole'. Directional potential is converted into vibration which replenishes the potential extracted. The iteration of time is said to cause the first motion.
2d) exemplifies how to interpret these tabular data. The weight of objects comes from balancing their velocities against their traveled distance, sizes, and remaining median distance. The effect produces linear oscillations that is fundamental to orbital dynamics. This feature not only applies to elastic collisions, but any exchange of motion and directional potentials between bodies within the set of a system. The system relies on a variant of the lever principle and is another aspect of the rebalancing and rearranging process including the iteration of time.
These two extras are for helping to follow the order of calculations. Extra 2) details how to exchange vector potentials for different collisions. It also explains how an object change its size. The recoil section is an elastic collision. The key take away there is to recognize that without atmospheric pressure and gravitational properties, elastic collisions provide a range of reactions from neutral( not a set), to minimum (use one unit of directional potential), to the maximum units of directional potentials. Therefore, the answer could be between an inelastic outcome to an explosive recoiled outcome as illustrated when maximum potentials were used. There are no single outcomes according to my logic. What outcome is preferred is unknown to me , so I'll maintain that the outcome vary in range. Legacy Scientific Math demands the lowest energy state. Quantity isn't size, but it's closely related. If more quantities were involved, size would be exchanged by association. This is a variant of decay due to quantities being exchanged or dispersed. I will craft examples for those at a later time.
Some previews for what's next:
1.0,2.0,3.0,4.0, and 5.0% are 100 to 500%. The artificial frequency averages those percentages after adding each to its total. Therefore, 100+200 averaged is 1.5, and 1.5 * size 2r = 3 in total. These increases represent extra frequency one must be at for a harmonized tuned cycle. This doesn't reflect a chaotic noise cycle which might have more radii close to it's center. The harmonized tuned version is hollow in its center. These calculations are as simple as that. I tried to complete it, but this will take some time getting used to. My prior posts illustrate how 2D polarized cycles produce quantities. They will explain radioactivity. 2D collisions with dominant directional potentials will explain decay and creation of neutrally polarized objects which will gain their own function of time if the byproduct is not matching in dimensional scale. 2D processes revealed to me that quantitative size ,as mass, must be consumed and replenish in order to meet different requirements for change. Mass and potential changes transcribe to motion and distance adjustments. 2D is a curved and rotational environment. Therefore, like I did in Isaac Newton Defeated, I'll use it to implement orbital dynamics, reflection and refraction, circumference and radius' impact on artificial frequency, remap and scale to fit the imbalanced areas, and provide other examples for 1D to 2D's interactions with bodies leading up to 3 bodies.
Most of these were solved already somewhere on the blog. Extra examples will refined those notions and formula. I'll try to do them one at a time until the 2D page is complete. This 2D page will be a heavy summery for those extra examples.
Comments
Post a Comment