Shared State Effects: Dominant or Shared Harmonizing Oriented Direction

DHOD and SHOD
DHOD and SHOD
I want to explore additional effects behind an aspect for Shared State. My focus will be on Dominant or Shared Harmonizing Oriented Direction ( DHOD, SHOD). Example 1 starts with a balance system. In that system, variables that I want to focus on are value, DHOD_Dt (H_Dt), SHOD_Dt (S_Dt), and their shared state variants. Each phase compounds on another from Balance_Imbalance (BIP) to Distributive phases (DP). Transformative re-Oriental Phase (TrOP) is equivalent to BIP plus DP. The reason for that is re-orientation is an indirect process that involves changing direction and distances like median distance (Md).Value is the only direct change in this example. Certain aspects of shared state are ignored. Aspects from the modulus dimension and its percentile functions are also delayed. Those indirect measures will be inclusive for the final product where logical statements will determine amounts for their shared values and rate of occurrence. My main ideas are how directional dominance appears, how it fuels distributive potentials, how distributions are shared, and what indirect re-orientations materialize from their interactions. My conclusion aligns with magnetic and electromagnetic states. Some systems will become cyclical where their median distances behave like springs redistributing shared potentials and values from body to body. Their distances contract and expand with a little hint of diffusion.  Whether artificial gravity is a superclass or subclass wasn't considered or adequately understood.   
DHOD and SHOD
DHOD and SHOD
Example 2 is similar to example one. Their differences amount to how much is attributable to dominance and how balanced are their shared values. Example 2's outcome is a balance system where area mitosis can still occur as shown by the expansion of the system's median distance.  Example 3 will involve 3 bodies. I'll require more time for that draft which I will add here. 

How the final product will be done will be in agreement with here: Compatibility: Area Mitosis

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Isaac Newton Defeated

Image
  Isaac Newton's Gravitational Formula.  First thing to acknowledge is that Isaac Newton does not use a quantitative measure even though mass(quantity of matter) is label as a variable in his equations. His methods are proportional, and I'll link to some statements that I made clarifying differences between quantitative and proportional operations. Once you've understood these instructions, you can easily manipulate symbolic mathematical fabrications to conform to prior results through proportional manipulation. These methods alone don't completely  reproduce reality's outcomes or difficulties managing quantitative operations. Quantitative instructions have limitations and do not easily induce disordered confusion through subtracting, or ill-mannered addition of variables through proportional manipulation. I further that limitation by abandoning use for negative numbers, which removes information. 0.98 acceleration ,for the greater mass, flies into Dialect's fac...
Read more

Almighty Darkness

Image
Darker Daimon's Logic. Darkness is a concept of the mind. It is pure abstraction in mental frameworks . In constructs of Darkness,  Logic  is materialize by consistent and predictable  instructions . Inconsistencies and randomness possess no bodies in the darkest of realms because they're attributes for those whom seek blinding light.   With careful curtail sensibility to reason, all entities deriving from dark abstractions should convert to physical or external  reality. These  interpretations  can only be found here and another place. All other names have no association with me or my developments.  Darker Daimon's Logic. General Contents
Read more

Compatibility: 0.5 Plus 1 Dimension

Image
  Magnetic Cycles and Artificial Gravity Modulus Function First things come first, you'll have to understand prior dimensional instructions to understand what lead me here. You can catch up here if you hadn't:  Compatibility: 0.5 Dimension  . Artificial Gravity's inception and methods were introduced here:  Distance(Remaining Time)  .Alright, I'll try to make it shorter than prior posts, but you can't take my word for it at this injunction. The major difference here is with the notion of 2D. Second dimension, according to me, does not possess an inherent directional structure that emerges from entities settling or balancing into a 2d environment. What's unique to 2D is spin or rotation. Because 1D requires ranges of dense threshold levels across traveled distances, the entirety of 1D objects, and dependencies on density, it lacks the potential to reorient itself , as a unified whole, even though it can traverse directionally. More conflicting constituencies decr...
Read more