Compatibility: 1 to 2 Dimension

One Dimensional magnetic Cycle Simplified.
One Dimensional magnetic Cycle Simplified
This is a summary from 0.5, 1 dimensions, and drafts I made on these subjects. First, I should disabuse power rule results in Clock Time and Shared State effects. Yes, it went 1^2, 2^2, 3^2, but you can see it's base on a similarly tuned , or harmonized, starting frequency as the Clock Time's pulse. By changing its frequency ,or other factors, it will displace that power rule like the Shared State shows. Technically, they say you can always derive a power rule, but that defeats the purpose of a curve. Technically, at smaller integrals, there is always some level of curvature as shown with rates from my square and rectangular examples. I define and use frequency time for time elements. I compare them and take their differences. I use these frequencies and differences to develop their Shared State where median distances evenly generate and distribute among entities. If these directional values meet some thresholds, distance's and size's effects on Directional Time will behave like a spring or rubber where these bodies oscillate between dominance for a period in change. I simplify clockwise Clock Time , finding distances from Time's directional potentials, exemplify some types and arrangements for balances(many more exists), and show an illustration for a one dimensional magnetic cycle where bodies proceed towards their opposing directional potentials due to influences from Clock Time, distances, sizes, Shared State, and levels of potential resistance resulting from changes to directional potential. I share how Clock Time, Shared State, and distances help reduce directional potential which transform Directional plus Clock Time into curves, swirls, or spirals distances. It's not totally accurate because I have to account for varying Clock Times between those values from 1 to 4 like 1.1, 1.2 etc. I consider these swirls or coils a type of induction. I supply basic instructions describing delicate balancing between Clock Time and Directional Time to adjust for a correct magnitude and types of induction.

XY's Wheels Within Wheels Dark Formula.
XY's Wheels Within Wheels Dark Formula
When a one dimensional magnetic cycle reaches thresholds in density, rotation, size, and Clock Time strength, it becomes a 2D entity with 0.5 to 1 dimensional elements as properties. It has an X and Y now, so I make use of a radius with Y in length. These Legacy Scientific Paradigm and Statistician God "EXPERTS" ,>:P MUHH!!!, don't understand the purpose behind dimensions, qualities, values, and quantities. I introduce how I find arc lengths using a 100% modulus for circumferences and area. Indeed, 360 degrees are better for accuracy because there are more points, but they didn't consider that low number when calculating day cycles around the Sun. I have fractions, so I can say ,"0.00001%" for more accuracy. Here, I argue that if radius , or median distance, 1 and 2 maintain Ry's length within a cycle, Time's potential activities distribute in ways to balance differences between frequencies that generate during their cycling. This is a Harmonized Tune Magnetic State. If slight adjustments occur for Ry's length, imbalances are not perfectly manage, so gaps produce by these activities will be evident. Densities for my radiuses obviously matter. From that logic, and formula for finding an arc's length is base on changes in directional potential, it was a breeze developing what I call Ezekiel's Wheels Within Wheels Dark Formula. It's wonderful. I can gaze at it for long periods. I bless logical understanding, Marduk's Wisdom,  The Serpent's Tree of Good and Evil to know all things, so that Gods and ill-references can recede to relics of the past. The future is where type 0+ civilization can dominate. I solve my first chaotic cycle puzzle when I realize that I can manipulate my own Mirage factor to mimic something that is not tune. I call it Harmonized Noise. If you paid attention and comprehend, this application wouldn't surprise you. By transferring Ry's length to the outside as XY's length, I create Min_Max functions to generate cycles mimicking planetary orbits. As with all directional potentials, I can adjust them under correct circumstances.  

2D Battery Cycles.
2D Battery Cycles
I adjust them with a simple analogy using what we now take for granted. I charge my time variables. Shared State is a basic form of that charging structure. It takes in Time's imbalanced directional potential values from dominant time elements , transform them into median distances or other distances, and redistribute them ,near evenly, to contributing bodies. All bodies share Vibration beyond the scope of traveled distances via 0.5 dimension. I hate to repeat, but these time elements can oscillate between directional dominance depending on correct threshold distributions for their directional potential values. My modulus dimension was a prelude to this charging analogy. Ya's and XY's lengths charge base on discharges, or exchanges, from Xa's. Ya's and XY's lengths proceed to charge Xb's until levels of resistance are met to discourage directional potential and magnetic cycling. These bring me to types of induction. Thus, Lower_low induction as a cycle in a small range of directional potentials or an escape.  Resistance thresholds are determine by interactions between sizes, Clock Time, Directional Time, granularity( Clock Time's quantitative and percentile strengths), and distances. These one dimensional formulas must incur 2D changes that I drafted here: Area Mitosis , Types of Dimensional BalanceThree Body Problem. You might want to read those other drafts that I made in my General Section.

Time Elements Escape Angles. 
Gravity Myths.
Gravity Myths

I add Gravity Myths to illustrate certain misconceptions about fall rates for objects. Gravity is not uniform. It does depend on frequencies, positions, special curvatures, density, and sizes. These factors can cause imbalances for fall rates. Compare your Earth's , or planet's, fall rate with its smaller moon. They fall similarly in time at their localized Shared State, but their frequencies are different. Earth falls harmoniously at a faster rate. In addition to that, straight line fall rates are a rarity. I've certainly never experienced an actual one. Objects fall in curves. Their positions from each other and their ranges from a surface determine arc bents and lengths for their paths. One will be greater than the other. This is even slightly. Remember, Earth propagates through traveled distance at a certain frequencies, so those objects will take curved paths. Clock Time's Harmonized Tune and Shared State adjust their rates and distances enough to achieve similar apparent fall in time. These are balance and imbalance cycles. That triangle is how I depicted a three body Shared State in 2D.  

Extras: You can see XY's Min_Max lengths meet my criterion for convex and concave arcs? Hmph! If you listen to purposeful morons, I'm sure that you'll copy them. Remember, straight, oblique, and curve lines have implicit frequencies ,which I'm still working out for X's and Y's 2D applications. Are Shared States real occurrences? Yes, they are in their shared zone, but their references, the bodies, still access their ,now, conserved metrics. I plan to further develop my ideas around min and max 2D states, total areas, and types of imbalances to balances. I might just edit this page later to add them here.

Are Shared States a Real Occurrence?
Are Shared States a Real Occurrence? 

Compatibility: 0.5 Plus 1 DimensionCompatibility: 0.5 Dimension

General Contents

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Isaac Newton Defeated

Almighty Darkness

Compatibility: 0.5 Plus 1 Dimension