Non-rational Isolative Assumptions.

I want to set a standard for summarizing these catalogs. If I'm describing mechanisms promoting rigorous instructions, I plan to summarize them to avoid unnecessary jargons or put strain on thoughts. 

According to some definitions Z = X * Y, X = Z/Y, and Y = Z/X. It is impossible to completely isolate an individual variable without redefining what each variable represents. Their relationship prevents one existing without the other. Speed , for example, cannot be in isolation from time and distance. 

Basic Definitions for Space-Time Examples.
Basic Definition for Space-Time

Expanding from above, it's spaghetti of thought to assert light travels only in the speed direction when speed's realization dependents on time's interaction with distance. Einstein's and Mathematicians' proportional and gamma factors allow light's motion in relativistic environments while adjusting its time and distance. Lacking careful considerations, these reflect patterns of misconceptions which don't factor in contradictions. If reductions, at what rates do these operate? Contractions and elongations for distance and time must have rates of change. What should someone expect from matter if these rates are at or above light's speed? If space contributes to the motion of matter, matter should absorb its speed and infinitely expands when all space-time contracts to zero in an instant. Total quantity for matter could slow contraction or expansion rates if one is reasonable.  This logical conclusion suggests light should hit any miniscule matter nearest to it. Yet, this doesn't always occur. Additionally, time's and distance's floors, at zero, should disabuse use of light's approximate 299,800,000 "meters per second" proportional units because quantitative space-time is invalid for these relativistic frames. If there is no distance, you can't use light's traveled distance in the equation, Numbskull. 

Concerning contractive and expansive rates, I'm including all matter and space-time in their multiverse concepts because I understand that they rank well under these delusionary grading. Are these relativistic frames as valid as other frames? They're pointless if it is not understood that proper instructions need to replace these botched hypotheses. I'm finding myself having lost great portions and possessing little interests in mainstream thought experiments like these.

This post links to Dimensional Errors. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Isaac Newton Defeated

Image
  Isaac Newton's Gravitational Formula.  First thing to acknowledge is that Isaac Newton does not use a quantitative measure even though mass(quantity of matter) is label as a variable in his equations. His methods are proportional, and I'll link to some statements that I made clarifying differences between quantitative and proportional operations. Once you've understood these instructions, you can easily manipulate symbolic mathematical fabrications to conform to prior results through proportional manipulation. These methods alone don't completely  reproduce reality's outcomes or difficulties managing quantitative operations. Quantitative instructions have limitations and do not easily induce disordered confusion through subtracting, or ill-mannered addition of variables through proportional manipulation. I further that limitation by abandoning use for negative numbers, which removes information. 0.98 acceleration ,for the greater mass, flies into Dialect's fac...
Read more

Almighty Darkness

Image
Darker Daimon's Logic. Darkness is a concept of the mind. It is pure abstraction in mental frameworks . In constructs of Darkness,  Logic  is materialize by consistent and predictable  instructions . Inconsistencies and randomness possess no bodies in the darkest of realms because they're attributes for those whom seek blinding light.   With careful curtail sensibility to reason, all entities deriving from dark abstractions should convert to physical or external  reality. These  interpretations  can only be found here and another place. All other names have no association with me or my developments.  Darker Daimon's Logic. General Contents
Read more

Compatibility: 0.5 Plus 1 Dimension

Image
  Magnetic Cycles and Artificial Gravity Modulus Function First things come first, you'll have to understand prior dimensional instructions to understand what lead me here. You can catch up here if you hadn't:  Compatibility: 0.5 Dimension  . Artificial Gravity's inception and methods were introduced here:  Distance(Remaining Time)  .Alright, I'll try to make it shorter than prior posts, but you can't take my word for it at this injunction. The major difference here is with the notion of 2D. Second dimension, according to me, does not possess an inherent directional structure that emerges from entities settling or balancing into a 2d environment. What's unique to 2D is spin or rotation. Because 1D requires ranges of dense threshold levels across traveled distances, the entirety of 1D objects, and dependencies on density, it lacks the potential to reorient itself , as a unified whole, even though it can traverse directionally. More conflicting constituencies decr...
Read more